After the new investment guidelines, pension fund managers will be able to invest in IPOs, FPOs, and offers for the sale of companies. Apart from, the scope for investing in pension funds will also increase, and now fund managers will be able to invest in companies of BSE200 and NSE 200.

After the new rules, the equity share of pension funds will increase, and subscribers will get a higher return on investment.

According to Supratim Bandyopadhyay, Chairman of PFRDA, the equity guidelines for fund managers have been prepared and now the scope of equity investment will increase and pension fund managers will be able to invest in companies of BSE200, NSE 200and the upcoming big IPOs.

PFRDA believes that there is risk in equity investment but there is potential for higher returns too. So far NPS has given a return of 11 percent in equity and at present, investment of 1 lakh crore is presented inequalities through pension funds and after the new rules, it will increase.

FDI limit has also been increased from 49 percent to 74 percent through changes in PFRDA Act, after which existing 7 pension fund managers can sell their stake to foreign partners and for the new fund managers coming via On Tap License also the foreign investment limit will be 74 percent.

The order came on two separate petitions filed by advocates Gaurav Kumar Bansal and Reepak Kansal which claimed that Covid being a disaster notified under the Disaster Management Act (DMA) 2005, the Central government will be bound by Section 12 (iii) of the Act providing for the ex-gratia of Rs 4 lakh for those who died during the disaster. On March 14, 2020, the Centre had declared COVID-19 to be a disaster under DMA.

The Court said under Section 12(iii) of DMA, NDMA needed to issue guidelines on the ex-gratia under minimum standards of relief as the word used in the Act is “shall”.

“The statutory duty is cast upon the authority to frame guidelines of the ex-gratia. By not recommending the ex-gratia, it can be said that the national authority (NDMA) failed to perform its statutory duty under Section 12 of DMA,” said the bench of justices Ashok Bhushan and MR Shah.

The guidelines for the ex-gratia would be guided by the requirement, availability of funds, and money allocated for other measures needed for mitigation, prevention, and relief about COVID-19.

The Centre had argued that while passing the DMA, the legislature didn’t contemplate a pandemic situation as the Act was meant to provide relief for one-time events such as earth earthquakes, cyclones, etc, or few incidents taking place periodically for some time. Further, the Centre argued that during Covid-19, it is adopted a multi-pronged approach in containing the harm caused by disaster by augmenting hospital, infrastructure, medical, supplies, drugs, insurance to health care providers, and food safety to poor citizens.